Eight UST sites closed or on-track for site closure using PetroFix

Case study highlights

  • Case studies of eight UST sites closed or on-track for site closure using PetroFix, including contaminants treated, approach, remedial design and results
  • Antea Group applied PetroFix using in situ application methods which included direct push injections through grid and barrier arrays and excavation emplacement
  • Why Antea Group readily adopted a promising new remedial amendment for site closures

This multi-site case study reviews eight underground storage tank (UST) sites where the leading global environmental consulting firm Antea® Group has closed the site or positioned it to be on-track for closure using PetroFix. Antea Group is amongst the first environmental consulting companies to recognize and adopt PetroFix as a tool to rapidly reduce PHC impacts and achieve remedial objectives in groundwater. Applying PetroFix with economic efficiency, the company successfully advanced a portfolio of legacy UST release sites through the closure process over a short timeframe. In this effort, Antea Group sought and obtained approvals through multiple state regulatory agencies, self-completed the designs to determine dosing and injection layouts, implemented PetroFix treatments using different in situ application methods, and conducted performance monitoring to demonstrate remedial objective attainment.

Ready to get started?

Our technical experts will work with you to design tailored remediation solutions that effectively address PFAS, chlorinated solvents, and petroleum hydrocarbons—helping you achieve your site goals with confidence.